Implementación institucional de un laboratorio cadavérico con técnica Thiel para educación médica basada en simulación y seguridad del paciente
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21142/mecp.2026.1.1.e012Palabras clave:
Cadáver, Embalsamamiento, Entrenamiento Simulado, Educación Médica, Seguridad del PacienteResumen
La educación basada en simulación es fundamental en la formación médica contemporánea, especialmente en disciplinas quirúrgicas de alto riesgo. Este artículo describe la implementación institucional de un Laboratorio de Cadáveres con técnica de Thiel en la Universidad Científica del Sur (Perú) para simulación avanzada y entrenamiento quirúrgico seguro. El laboratorio se desarrolló mediante una evaluación de necesidades y estándares internacionales, integrando infraestructura especializada, bioseguridad y un marco educativo basado en competencias. El uso de cadáveres con técnica de Thiel permitió un entrenamiento de alta fidelidad en anestesia regional, medicina estética, cirugía mínimamente invasiva y de columna. Este enfoque facilitó la práctica repetida de procedimientos complejos en un entorno controlado, desplazando las fases críticas de la curva de aprendizaje lejos de los pacientes reales. La experiencia demuestra que la simulación cadavérica mejora las competencias técnicas, fortalece la seguridad del paciente y es un modelo escalable para el posgrado.
Descargas
Referencias
1. Altbach PG. Global perspectives on higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016.
2. Kaplan A. Higher education at the crossroads of disruption: The university of the 21st century. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2021. doi: 10.1108/9781800715011.
3. Marginson S. The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. High Educ. 2016;72(4):413-434. doi: 10.1007/ s10734-016-0016-x.
4. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;306(9):978-988. doi: 10.1001/ jama.2011.1234.
5. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10-28. doi: 10.1080/01421590500046924.
6. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? Acad Med. 2011;86(6):706-711. doi: 10.1097/ ACM.0b013e318217e119.
7. Okuda Y, Bryson EO, DeMaria S, Jacobson L, Quinones J, Shen B, et al. The utility of simulation in medical education: What is the evidence? Mt Sinai J Med. 2009;76(4):330-343. doi: 10.1002/msj.20127.
8. Zendejas B, Brydges R, Wang AT, Cook DA. Patient outcomes in simulation-based medical education: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(8):1078-1089. doi: 10.1007/s11606- 012-2264-5.
9. Armijo-Rivera S, Machuca-Contreras F, Raul N, Nunes de Oliveira S, Ballesteros Mendoza I, Shibao Miyasato H, et al. Characterization of simulation centers and programs in Latin America according to the ASPIRE and SSH quality criteria. Adv Simul (Lond). 2021;6:41. doi: 10.1186/s41077-021-00188-8.
10. Ministry of Health of Peru (MINSA). Plan Nacional de Calidad en Salud y Seguridad del Paciente 2026-2030 [Internet]. Lima: MINSA; 2019 [cited 2026 Mar 23]. Available from: https:// www.gob.pe/institucion/minsa/normas-legales/7778826- 156-2026-minsa
11. World Health Organization. Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030 [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2018 [cited 2026 March 23]. Available from: https:// www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241511131
12. Lateef F. Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3(4):348-352. doi: 10.4103/0974- 2700.70743.
13. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1923-1958. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(10)61854-5.
14. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To err is human: building a safer health system. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000. doi: 10.17226/9728.
15. Leape LL. Making healthcare safe: The story of the patient safety movement. Cham: Springer; 2021.
16. Griffin FA. Detection of adverse events in surgical patients using the IHI Surgical Trigger Tool. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(4):253-258. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025080.
17. Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):768-770. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768.
18. Aggarwal R, Mytton OT, Derbrew M, Hananel D, Heydenburg M, Issenberg B, et al. Training and simulation for patient safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2010;19(Suppl 2):i34-i43. doi: 10.1136/ qshc.2009.038562.
19. McGaghie WC, Draycott TJ, Dunn WF, Lopez CM, Stefanidis D. Evaluating the impact of simulation on translational patient outcomes. Simul Healthc. 2011 Aug;6(Suppl):S42-S47. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318222fde9.
20. Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, O’Leary KJ, Wayne DB. Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10):2697-701.
21. Rosen MA, Hunt EA, Pronovost PJ, Federowicz MA, Weaver SJ. In situ simulation in continuing professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012;32(4):243-254. doi: 10.1002/ chp.21152.
22. World Health Organization. Global patient safety action plan 2021–2030: towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2021 [cited 2026 Mar 23]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/ item/9789240032705
23. Groscurth P, Eggli P, Kapfhammer J, Rager G, Hornung JP, Fasel JD. Gross anatomy in the surgical curriculum in Switzerland: Improved cadaver preservation, anatomical models, and curriculum development. Anat Rec. 2001;265(5):254-256. doi: 10.1002/ar.10030.
24. Rizzolo LJ, Stewart WB. Should we continue teaching anatomy by dissection? Anat Rec B New Anat. 2006;289B(6):215-218. doi: 10.1002/ar.b.20117.
25. James HK, Chapman AW, Pattison GTR, Griffin DR, Fisher JD. Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training. Br J Surg. 2019;106(13):1726- 1734. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11325.
26. Wayne DB, Butter J, Siddall VJ, Fudala MJ, Wade LD, Feinglass J, et al. Mastery learning of advanced cardiac life support skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(3):251-256. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00341.x.
27. Amrit G, Ray S, Mohapatra S. Preparation of soft embalmed cadavers by the modified Thiel embalming technique for surgical skill training and development of a universal quantitative scoring system to assess the suitability of soft embalmed cadavers for such training purposes. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e43991. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43991.
28. Gilbody J, Prasthofer AW, Ho K, Costa ML. The use and effectiveness of cadaveric workshops in higher surgical training: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93(5):347-352. doi: 10.1308/147870811X582954.
29. Gnanakumar S, Kostusiak M, Budohoski KP, Barone D, Pizzuti V, Kirollos R, et al. Effectiveness of cadaveric simulation in neurosurgical training: a review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2018;118:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.015.
30. Hammer N, Löffler S, Bechmann I, Steinke H, Hädrich C, Feja C. Comparison of modified Thiel embalming and ethanolglycerin fixation in an anatomy environment: potentials and limitations of two complementary techniques. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8(1):74-85. doi: 10.1002/ase.1450 .
31. Brenner E. Human body preservation – Old and new techniques. J Anat. 2014;224(3):316-344. doi: 10.1111/joa.12160.
32. Benkhadra M, Bouchot A, Gérard J, Genelot D, Trouilloud P, Martin L, et al. Flexibility of Thiel’s embalmed cadavers: the explanation is probably in the muscles. Surg Radiol Anat. 2011;33(4):365-368. doi: 10.1007/s00276-010-0703-8.
33. Jansen MM, Cedernholm A, Göransson C, et al. Feasibility of fresh frozen human cadavers as a research and training model for endovascular image guided interventions. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0242596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242596.
34. Thiel W. Die Konservierung ganzer Leichen in natürlichen Farben. Ann Anat. 1992;174(3):185-195. doi: 10.1016/S0940- 9602(11)80346-8.
35. Ottone NE, Vargas CA, Fuentes R, Del Sol M. Walter Thiel’s embalming method. Review of solutions and applications in different fields of biomedical research. Int J Morphol. 2016;34(4):1442-1454. doi: 10.4067/S0717-95022016000400044.
36. Hammer N. Thirty years of Thiel embalming—A systematic review on its utility in medical research. Clin Anat. 2022;35(8):987-997. doi: 10.1002/ca.23936.
37. Yiasemidou M, Roberts D, Glassman D, Tomlinson J, Biyani CS, Miskovic D, et al. A multispecialty evaluation of Thiel cadavers for surgical training. World J Surg. 2017 Jul;41(7):1776- 1785. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3894-7.
38. Balta JY, Cronin M, Cryan JF, O’Mahony SM. Human preservation techniques in anatomy: A 21st century medical education perspective. Clin Anat. 2015;28(6):725-734. doi: 10.1002/ca.22585.
39. Villacorta PRF, Hernando HCT, Abdulla AJ, Barroa JKH. A comparative study of Thiel soft-embalmed and formalinpreserved cadavers for anatomy dissection. Acta Med Philipp. 2019;53(1):12-20. doi: 10.47895/amp.v53i1.235.
40. James HK, Chapman AW, Pattison GT, Griffin DR, Fisher JD. Cadaveric simulation versus standard training for postgraduate trauma and orthopaedic surgical trainees: protocol for the CAD:TRAUMA study multicentre randomised controlled educational trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e037319. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037319.
41. McLeod G, Eisma R, Schwab A, Corner G, Soames R, Cochran S. An evaluation of Thiel-embalmed cadavers for ultrasoundbased regional anaesthesia training and research. Ultrasound. 2010;18(3):125-129. doi: 10.1258/ult.2010.010016.
42. Munirama S, Eisma R, Columb M, Corner GA, McLeod GA. Physical properties and functional alignment of softembalmed Thiel human cadaver when used as a simulator for ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(5):699-707. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev548.
43. Wilke HJ, Werner K, Häussler K, Reinehr M, Böckers TM. Thiel-fixation preserves the non-linear load-deformation characteristics of the spine. J Biomech. 2011;44(13):2478-2481. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.07.013.
44. De la Cruz Anticona SM, Palomino Perez MN, Escobedo Villacorta GC, Medina Victorio VA, Franco Salinas JC. Percepciones de estudiantes y docentes sobre el uso de cadáveres embalsamados en técnica Thiel en la enseñanza de anatomía aplicada a la medicina estética [abstract]. In: XLV Congreso de la Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía y III Congreso Latinoamericano de Morfología Clínica; 2025; Chile.
45. Sawhney C, Lalwani S, Ray BR, Sinha S, Kumar A. Benefits and pitfalls of cadavers as learning tool for ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Anesth Essays Res. 2017;11(1):3-6. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186607.
46. Lawley A, Zin MT, Turbet C, Hampson R, Dobie G. Thiel cadaver suitability for image-based abdominal ultrasound research. Ann Anat. 2025;262:152713. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2025.152713.
47. Benkhadra M, Faust A, Ladoire S, Trost O, Trouilloud P, Girard C, et al. Comparison of fresh and Thiel’s embalmed cadavers according to the suitability for ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia of the cervical region. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009;31(7):531–535. doi: 10.1007/s00276-009-0477-z.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Medical Education & Clinical Practice

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.


