A.I. don't care:
aportes de la filosofía feminista de la tecnología para la Bioética cibernética
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21142/DES-1502-2023-0022Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, bioethics, cyberneticsAbstract
This paper examines the relationship between digital transformation and bioethics, drawing on insights from feminist theories of technology (TFT). The overall aim is to enrich the philosophical debate on biopolitical challenges (Bratton, 2021) that demand a robust bioethics, such as ecological catastrophe or the medicalization of life (Mainetti, 1990). The specific objectives are twofold: firstly, to explore the need to reinvigorate bioethics conceptually by reconnecting it with its neglected cybernetic origins (Potter, 1971), using concepts such as «antinaturalism» (Hester, 2019) and «antigenealogy» (Preciado, 2020). Secondly, to investigate the emergence of a «bioethification» (Calvo, 2019) that reflects the ethics of the mediations between humans, algorithms, and nature, using the notions of «care» (Nurock, 2020) and «dilemma» (Gilligan, 1982). In the first case, TFT allows us to avoid the moral absolutism of both technology and nature, without falling into their absolute relativization. In the second case, by analyzing AI devoted to care, TFT clarifies the impact of algorithmic systems on the development of moral competencies.
Downloads
References
Artaud, A. (2005). El arte y la muerte. Otros escritos. Caja Negra.
Bratton, B. (2021). The revenge of the real, politics for a post pandemic world. Verso.
Calvo, P. (2019). Bioética de las Cosas: sobre la algoritmización de la deliberación moral en la práctica clínica. Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, 20(2), 155-162.
Calvo, P. (2020). Etificiación. En J. Pizzi y M. Cenci (coords.), Global Observatory for Social Pathologies. Federal University of Pelotas.
Expósito, J. (2022). Feminismos revolucionarios. Livriz.
Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex. The case for feminist revolution. Verso.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Harvard University Press.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman. Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
Hester, H. (2019). Xenofeminismo. Caja Negra.
Haraway D. (2021). Seguir con el problema. Consonni.
Mainetti, J. A. (1990). Bioética fundamental. La crisis bioética. Quirón.
Mittelstadt, B. D., Mariarosaria, P. A., Wachter, S. y Floridi L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1-21.
Nurock, V. (2020). Puede prestar cuidados la inteligencia artificial. Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales, 38(2), 217-229.
Piedra Herrera, D. (2013). Cuestionamientos a la globalización en Bioética. Revista Redbioética/UNESCO, 2(8), 93-101.
Potter, V. R. (1970). Bioethics: the science of survival. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 14(1), 127-153.
Potter, V. R. (1971). Bioethics: bridge to de future. Prentice-Hall.
Preciado, P. B. (2017). Testo yonqui. Sexo drogas y biopolítica. Paidós.
Preciado, P. (2020). Yo soy el monstruo que os habla. Anagrama.
Reynoso, C. (2015). Complejidad y caos: Una exploración antropológica. SB.
Rodríguez, P. (2019). Las palabras en las cosas. Saber, poder y subjetivación entre algorítmos y biomoléculas. Cactus.
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N. y Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 18-24. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/books/Wiener-teleology.pdf
Stanley, A. (1998). Women hold up two-thirds of the sky: Notes for a revised history of technology. En P. Hopkins (ed.), Sex/Machine. Readings in culture, gender and technology. Indiana University Press.
Stiegler, B. (Ed.). (2021). Bifurcate: There is no alternative. Open Humanities Press.
Tiqqun. (2015). La hipótesis cibernética. Hekht Libros.
Torrano A. y Fischetti N., (2020). Filosofía feminista de la técnica y la tecnología. Notas para una academia latinoamericana activista. Revista de Filosofía, 11(23). https://revistas.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/11058]
Tronto, J. (2013). Caring democracy. NYU Press.
Vergés Bosch, N. (2013) Teorías feministas de la tecnología: evolución y principales debates. https://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/45624/1/Teor%C3%ADas%20Feministas%20de%20la%20Tecnolog%C3%ADa.pdf
Wiener, N. (2000). Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine. (2.ª ed.). MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Esta obra está bajo una licencia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/